Up until the introduction of Dysport, Botox was the top pick of most individuals looking to eliminate wrinkles. Both products are very effective at getting rid of wrinkles and use the same ingredient. But they have different properties that might make one a better option than the other in select circumstances.
Botox vs. Dysport
Both Dysport and Botox are made from type A botulinum toxin sourced from botulism-causing bacteria. These injectable products relax the muscles that create wrinkles, explains clarityskin.com. The botulinum toxin is capable of blocking nerve signals in facial muscles to weaken them and smooth out wrinkles. The effects of Dysport and Botox could last between three and four months and share the same potential side effects such as numbness and bruising in the injection sites.
Doctors usually recommend Botox over Dysport because it doesn’t spread and is, therefore, better for small areas like crow’s feet. They’re also inclined to use Botox simply because it has been around for about 30 years and they have more experience administering it.
On the other hand, some doctors might choose Dysport over Botox because it works significantly faster. Most patients who’ve had Dysport injections done see noticeable results in just one day, while Botox patients only see results in about three days. Dysport is likewise known to spread or diffuse when injected so it’s better for treating larger areas, such as the forehead and underarms to counteract excessive sweating. In addition, Dysport might also be more affordable depending on the size of the treatment area.
The Key Takeaway
There is no doubt that both Dysport and Botox are effective at combating facial lines and wrinkles. In the end, it doesn’t really matter which one you choose to go with because what matters most is who’s administering the procedure. Remember, bad results of cosmetic procedures are made by those who administer them, and not the specific product used.